Did you follow the Apple iPad Pro content debacle?
Here’s a quick recap. A recent online ad for the new iPad Pro showed a large hydraulic press slowly crushing various symbols of creativity. A metronome, a piano, a record player, a video game, paints, books, and other creative tools splinter and smash as the Sonny and Cher song All I Ever Need Is You plays.
The ad’s title? “Crush!”
The point of the commercial — I think — is to show that Apple managed to smush (that’s the technical term) all this heretofore analog creativity into its new, very thin iPad Pro.
To say the ad received bad reviews is underselling the response. Judgment was swift and unrelenting. The creative world freaked out.
On X, actor Hugh Grant shared Tim Cook’s post featuring the ad and added this comment: “The destruction of the human experience. Courtesy of Silicon Valley.”
When fellow actor Justine Bateman shared the Tim Cook post, she simply wrote, “Truly, what is wrong with you?” Other critiques ranged from tone-challenged to wasteful to many worse things.
A couple of days later, Apple apologized and canceled plans to air the ad on television.
How not-so-great content ideas come to life
The level of anger surprises me. Look, the ad does show the eyeballs on an emoji-faced squishy ball popping under the plates’ pressure, but still. Calling the ad “actually psychotic” might be a skosh over the top.
Yes, the ad missed the mark. And the company’s subsequent decision to apologize makes sense.
But anyone who’s participated in creating a content misfire knows this truth: Mistakes look much more obvious in hindsight.
On paper, I bet this concept sounded great. The brainstorming meeting probably started with something like this: “We want to show how the iPad Pro metaphorically contains this huge mass of creative tools in a thin and cool package.”
Maybe someone suggested representing that exact thing with CGI (maybe a colorful tornado rising from the screen). Then someone else suggested showing the actual physical objects getting condensed would be more powerful.
Here’s my imagined version of the conversation that might have happened after someone pointed out the popular internet meme of things getting crushed in a hydraulic press.
“People love that!”
“If we add buckets of paint, it will be super colorful and cool.”
“It’ll be a cooler version of that LG ad that ran in 2008.”
“Exactly!”
“It’ll be just like that ad where a bus driver kidnaps and subsequently crushes all the cute little Pokémon characters in a bus!” (Believe it or not, that was actually a thing.)
The resulting commercial suffers from the perfect creative storm: A not-great (copycat) idea at the absolutely wrong time.
None of us know what constraints Apple’s creative team worked under. How much time did they have to come up with a concept? Did they have time to test it with audiences? Maybe crushing physical objects fit into the budget better than CGI. All these factors affect the creative process and options (even at a giant company like Apple).
That’s not an excuse — it’s just reality.
Content failure or content mistake?
Many ad campaigns provoke a “What the hell were they thinking?” response (think Pepsi’s Kendall Jenner ad or those cringy brand tributes that follow celebrity deaths).
Does that mean they’re failures? Or are they mistakes? And what’s the difference?
As I wrote after Peloton’s holiday ad debacle (remember that?), people learn to fear mistakes early on. Most of us hear cautionary messages almost from day one.
Some are necessary and helpful (“Don’t stick a knife in a live toaster” or “Look both ways before you cross the street.”) Some aren’t (“Make that essay perfect” or “Don’t miss that goal.”)
As a result, many people grow up afraid to take risks — and that hampers creativity. The problem arises from conflating failure and mistakes. It helps to know the difference.
I moved to Los Angeles in 1987 to become a rock ‘n’ roll musician. I failed. But it wasn’t a mistake. I wasn’t wrong to try. My attempt just didn’t work.
Labeling a failed attempt a “mistake” feeds the fears that keep people from attempting anything creative.
The conflation of failure and mistakes happens all too often in creative marketing. Sure, people create content pieces (and let’s not forget that there are always people behind those ideas) that genuinely count as mistakes.
They also create content that simply fails.
Don’t let extreme reactions make you fear failures
Here’s the thing about failed content. You can do all the work to research your audience and take the time to develop and polish your ideas — and the content still might fail. The story, the platform, or the format might not resonate, or the audience simply might not care for it. That doesn’t mean it’s a mistake.
Was the Apple ad a mistake? Maybe, but I don’t think so.
Was it a failure? The vitriolic response indicates yes.
Still, the commercial generated an impressive amount of awareness (53 million views of the Tim Cook post on X, per Variety.) And, despite the apology, the company hasn’t taken the ad down from its YouTube page where it’s earned more than 1 million views.
The fictional Captain Jean Luc Picard once said, “It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not weakness. That is life.” The Apple ad turns that statement on its head — Apple made many mistakes and still won a tremendous amount of attention.
I’m not suggesting that people shouldn’t criticize creative work. Constructive critiques help us learn from our own and others’ failures. You can even have a good laugh about content fails.
Just acknowledge, as the Roman philosopher Cicero once wrote, “Not every mistake is a foolish one.”
Creative teams take risks. They try things outside their comfort zone. Sometimes they fail (sometimes spectacularly).
But don’t let others’ expressions of anger over failures inhibit your willingness to try creative things.
Wouldn’t you love to get the whole world talking about the content you create? To get there, you have to risk that level of failure.
And taking that risk isn’t a mistake.
It’s your story. Tell it well.
HANDPICKED RELATED CONTENT:
Cover image by Joseph Kalinowski/Content Marketing Institute
